CurrentCare: Rhode Island’s Health Information Exchange

A special thanks to Laura Adams, President & CEO of the Rhode Island Quality Institute; Chuck Jones, President & CEO of Thundermist Health Center; Matthew Roman, Chief Operating Officer of Thundermist Health Center; and Jane Hayward, CEO of the Rhode Island Health Center Association for their contributions to this post. 


By Thao-Chi Tran

Health information exchanges (HIEs) are entities that facilitate the access and sharing of patient information electronically, and are emerging as key tools in the drive to achieve the Triple Aim (improving patient experience and population health while reducing system costs). States have been active in developing and facilitating HIEs through various federal grants and state legislation. Since the passage of Rhode Island Health Information Exchange Act of 2008, the state has been working to improve health care coordination through its statewide HIE known as CurrentCare.

CurrentCare in Rhode Island

CurrentCare is owned and operated by the Rhode Island Quality Institute (RIQI), a 501(c)3, and the state-designated Regional Health Information Organization. RIQI’s board consists of CEO-level leaders representing health plans, hospitals, physician groups, health centers, consumers, employers and state government.  In 2015, over 490,000 patients were enrolled in CurrentCare, and now even more patients are being served through HIPAA-compliant agreements to share data among providers.  Patients are enrolled through their physician offices, at hospitals, free-standing labs, long-term care facilities, etc.  Enrollment is voluntary and allows health information including medication histories, laboratory results, diagnostic reports and clinical summaries to be shared and accessed electronically among providers.   Rhode Island was the first statewide HIE in the nation to upload alcohol and substance abuse treatment information from 42 CFR Part 2 mental health providers.  A provider must have a treating relationship with the patient to access the patient’s health information. Health centers in particular have played a major role in educating patients about CurrentCare and enrolling them into the HIE.

CurrentCare was implemented with federal grant funds from the HITECH Act. To ensure the sustainability of CurrentCare, RIQI and its partners in state government and the private sector implemented a voluntary contribution where multiple entities agreed to contribute to a $1 per member per month (PMPM) operate and scale the system.   The $1 PMPM is based on the number of “covered lives” for whom each of the entities provides health insurance. These payers include Medicaid, the State as an employer, all major commercial insurers in the state, and self-funded employers, such as CVS, Brown University, AAA and Amica.  RIQI also has other funding streams from fee-based products and services and grants.

Today, RIQI is piloting a dashboard that alerts primary care providers, in real time, of patients’ emergency department and hospital admissions and discharges. The dashboard enables them to immediately see the reason for the admission and the pattern of admissions, and to view clinical summary reports as well as identify the hospital system in which their patients were admitted. The pilot group has observed lower hospital readmission and emergency department return rates compared to providers in CurrentCare that lack the dashboard. This function exhibits the potential to improve care coordination between hospitals and primary care practices and to reduce health care costs.   Analysis of the data for the basic alerting function shows an approximate 12% relative reduction in hospital readmissions and a 22% relative reduction in ED visits for patients whose providers receive alerts versus patients whose providers do not, a trend that is consistent over more than 18 months.

The Health Center Experience

Thundermist, a health center serving nearly 43,000 patients in Rhode Island, is piloting the dashboard and is also using CurrentCare as a resource to gather information on patients that do not meet quality of care measures. Through the state HIE, staff have been able to find patients’ prior health screenings and tests that are not recorded in the health center’s electronic health record (EHR). This allows Thundermist to prevent duplication of health care services and improve patient care and outcomes without having to invest significant amounts of time in tracking down this information.[1] This has also has implications for the health center’s performance measures.  The next phase for CurrentCare includes levering its analytics capabilities for prediction and early intervention, and developing more real-time care summaries served up inside of the clinician workflow based on clinician-derived preferences.

Until a basic level of interoperability is reached, the use of HIEs will still need to be complemented by separate access to various existing electronic health records. The formatting of clinical reports retrieved from a HIE may not include specific details that certain providers need to treat patients. The inconsistency of EHR types utilized by different health care settings and the lack of technology that would allow different EHRs to communicate are other major barriers to exchanging health information electronically.  While this is exactly the challenge that CurrentCare solves by collecting, normalizing, organizing, and storing the data regardless of the EHR platform from which it originated, not all states have a CurrentCare-like infrastructure in place.

Despite the challenges, there are opportunities for health centers to improve patient outcomes as well as performance. By participating in a HIE a health center is able build stronger relationships with other providers and better understand and respond to their patients’ experiences beyond the health center’s walls. Although states and providers may assume additional financial costs to operate and engage in HIEs, patients’ health care quality is increasing as a result. In addition, better care management via HIEs can potentially reduce health care costs. HIEs, such as CurrentCare, have made noteworthy strides in the field of health information technology.  As HIEs develop and interoperability increases, there will be more opportunities to improve care coordination and effectively address the needs of patients.

Learn More About HIEs

To learn more about the different types of HIE’s and the challenges and barriers associated with each, checkout NACHC’s new publication Health Information Exchange: Opportunities and Challenges for Health Centers on MyNACHC.


[1] Providers in CurrentCare can send data to the HIE, but do not receive data other than alerts, and have to access various health systems to retrieve certain health information.

Are you an Essential Community Provider?

Are you on the list?

CMS has released its draft 2018 Essential Community Provider list, the list used by Qualified Health Plans in the Marketplace to meet the ECP contracting requirement.    Take a look at the announcement below to find out how to determine if you are on the list and if not, how to complete the petition process to get your name on the list.  Please note, if you want to submit a petition, you must do so before the October 15, 2016 deadline.  Any questions should be directed to


Announcement of Public Release of the Draft HHS Essential Community Provider (ECP) List and Petition for the 2018 Benefit Year:


For the Marketplace’s 2018 benefit year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released the updated Essential Community Provider (ECP) Petition to collect more complete data from providers who qualify as an ECP and wish to appear on CMS’s ECP list for the 2018 benefit year.  The ECP petition is a web-based questionnaire that is available at the following link:


CMS releases an updated list of ECPs on an annual basis to assist issuers in complying with the requirements under 45 CFR 156.235.  Under that regulation, ECPs are defined as health care providers who serve predominantly low-income, medically underserved individuals.  They include health care providers defined in section 340B(a)(4) of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act; entities described in section 1927(c)(1)(D)(i)(IV) of the Social Security Act (SSA); State-owned family planning service sites, governmental family planning service sites, not-for-profit family planning service sites that do not receive Federal funding under special programs, including under Title X of the PHS Act; or Indian health care providers. 


The Draft HHS ECP list for the 2018 benefit year is embedded within ECP petition and can be viewed by clicking the button “Check to see if you are on the list” under question 6 of the petition located at  Providers included on the draft HHS ECP list for the benefit year 2018 reflect those providers who submitted an ECP petition between December 9, 2015 and July 11, 2016 and were approved by CMS for inclusion on the ECP list through the ECP petition review process.  CMS has published this draft HHS list of ECPs to provide entities on the list an opportunity through the petition process to notify CMS of any necessary corrections and missing provider data.  In addition, CMS solicits providers who do not yet appear on the HHS ECP list but believe they satisfy the ECP inclusion criteria, as outlined in the ECP petition, to petition to be added to the list. 


CMS is accepting petitions from qualified providers until 11:59 p.m. ET on October 15, 2016, for data corrections and additions to be considered for the 2018 ECP List.


Providers who need technical assistance with the ECP petition or may have general questions may receive assistance by emailing their question(s) to the following mailbox:  Providers should write in the subject line of the email the following: “Comments on ECP Petition.”  




Joshua Fleming, MPP Candidate, University of Michigan – Ann Arbor, Contact Info:

Joshua joins NACHC as a graduate student from the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. His primary interests include health care finance, Medicaid managed care and political advocacy. Born and raised in Bay City, Michigan, Joshua has blended his two primary passions: political engagement and health policy into one while working as a Field Organizer for the Michigan Democratic Partjoshy, a Constituent Services Intern for the Michigan House of Representatives and a Public Health Services Intern at a county health department. Upon obtaining his BA in Public Administration, Joshua enlisted as a HIV/AIDS Educator in the Peace Corps, serving in Swaziland where he engaged in efforts to prevent and mitigate the spread of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa and enhance financial literacy and micro-loan opportunities for those in his community. At the University of Michigan, Joshua serves as Managing Editor of the Michigan Journal of Public Affairs and as a Rackham Merit Fellow, a prestigious fellowship for graduate students who have records of superior academic achievement and come from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds in their respective academic disciplines. After graduating next May, Joshua plans to pursue work in the federal government or a think-tank, helping to formulate and analyze proposals to expand health care access while controlling costs.

Doron Shore, BS Canididate, American University, Contact Info:

Doron Shore is an intern in the Regulatory and Federal Affairs departments from Ardmore, Pennsylvania, a doronPhiladelphia suburb. Currently, Doron is a rising senior at American University pursuing a B. S. in Public Health. In the fall semester of 2015, Doron attended the American University Public Health Abroad Program in Nairobi, Kenya. There, he took public health classes and interned at a school in Kibera, which is regularly considered the largest urban slum in Africa. While in Kenya, he also conducted a public health survey focusing on malaria with his classmates. Returning from his amazing experience abroad, Doron recognized that we do not need to travel half way around the world to a developing country to witness communities struggling with public health issues. As an intern with regulatory and federal affairs departments, he is committed to learning more about careers in the public health field and how community health centers are making people across America healthier.

NACHC Welcomes Two New Summer Interns to the State Affairs Team

We are very excited to introduce our Summer 2016 State Affairs Intern Team, Antoinette Silva and Thao-Chi Tran!

Antoinette Silva, BS, Central Michigan University, Contact info:

Antoinette is a Saginaw, Michigan native who has a strong advocacy and research background working with rural and underserved populations. In 2013, she taught English in South Korea for the National Institute for Intantoinetteernational Education. Most recently, she interned with Michigan Area Health Education Center where she assisted with the development of public relations and communications strategies to support pipeline programs and increase community awareness in high schools of rural Michigan. In March 2016, she individually conducted a twenty-one county health center patient survey used as a HRSA site visit program requirement at the FQHC, MidMichigan Community Health Services. She is an active advocacy committee member for Eta Sigma Gamma, a National Health Education Honorary. In her free time, Antoinette enjoys running, yoga, and has the travel bug with the willingness to relocate. Upon completion of her internship, Antoinette desires to work for a national or state agency deeply involved with promoting access to healthcare through advocacy and research initiatives and sees herself developing programs and continuing policy research supporting underserved populations.

Thao-Chi Tran, MPH Candidate, George Washington University, Contact info:

Chi comes to us from San Jose, California. She is a UC Berkeley graduate and is primarily interested in the areas of health policy and advocacy.  In 2013, she began working with the San Jose Foothill Community Health Center, an FQHC in San Jose, CA. She served as a health services navigator and connected patients with health care and social services. She was alchiso a certified enrollment counselor for Medicaid and the state health insurance exchange, Covered California. In 2015, she started working with Community Health Partnership, a consortium of FQHCs in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties in CA, where she assisted with the operations of the consortium and the member health centers, including advocating for state legislation that expands health care to underserved individuals. Currently, she is a graduate student in the Health Policy MPH program at GWU. She is also assisting with health policy research by performing literature reviews and data analysis for an Outreach & Enrollment barriers and challenges project for the Geiger Gibson/RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative.  This program is valuable for health centers in that it will help with creating necessary resources and identifying the great work health centers are doing across the nation. After graduation next year, Chi hopes to do policy-oriented work in health care, either in DC or back home in Northern CA, through which she can continue being an advocate for health centers and the communities they serve.

CMS Issues Several Documents of Importance to Health Centers

UPDATE:  Check out the NACHC summary of the issues impacting FQHCs in the final rule and State Health Officials’ letter here.


Last week CMS published two documents last week which will strengthen health centers’ and PCAs’ ability to protect their payment rights under Medicaid managed care. They are:

We will be providing detailed information on both of these documents in the near future. In the short term, here is a listing of key policies around PPS reimbursement that were announced in these documents:

  • Starting in July 2017, States may “delegate wrap” to MCOs only for those FQHCs that have agreed to this approach.
  • Starting in July 2017, every Medicaid and CHIP MCO will be required to contract with at least one FQHC in each service area.
  • Incentive payments made by Medicaid MCOs may not be counted against PPS payment.
  • Value-based payment (VBP) arrangements must adhere to the statutory requirements for PPS.

As we noted, more detailed information will be coming soon. In the meantime, if you have any questions please contact Colleen Meiman or Susan Sumrell.